<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - mesa does not build after nouveau loader changes" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76376#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - mesa does not build after nouveau loader changes" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76376">bug 76376</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jsg@openbsd.org" title="Jonathan Gray <jsg@openbsd.org>"> Jonathan Gray</a> <pre>It isn't 'old libdrm' or 'random files' it is a specific subset for the drivers the kernel supports. The history here seems to be that five years ago Owain removed the autoconf portions for reasons I'm not entirely clear on. Normally this is because of something like a requirement on gnu make and python in a build system. The diff we have to libdrm is quite minimal, and includes changes for our privilege separated server and a drmCheckModesettingSupported() case for OpenBSD. If the answer here is all the _drm.h files must be installed fine, I'll work something out. Maybe we'll go back to having multiple copies of the headers instead of sharing them between userland and the kernel.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>