<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [NVCF] PWM fan speed too high"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80901#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [NVCF] PWM fan speed too high"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80901">bug 80901</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@ensi-bourges.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@ensi-bourges.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=80901#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> The problem I see with trip-points is that those allow to set a fixed PWM
> value when the sensors detect a certain temperature. The nouveau driver
> instead raises the fan speed "continuously" after a certain temperature is
> reached (would we need infinite trip-points for that?).
> Please correct any error in my understanding here :)
>
> Maybe we can use the trip points as a start/end point and then move
> autonomously disregarding the point[0-*]_pwm value?
>
>
> For now, if you agree, I will move the sysfs values as suggested (and change
> the documentation), hopefully before/during next weekend.
> So this bug will still have an almost "clean" patch for anyone (included me)
> who want it.
> Then I will ask around in the lm-sensors mailing list (is it the correct
> one?). Hopefully someone can point me to a better solution.
>
> Thanks for the review! :)</span >
Yes, you understood my review and have a perfect todo list! Good luck with it
:)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>