<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [NV10, NV20] bad/missing graphics, usually alpha-related"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51477#c29">Comment # 29</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [NV10, NV20] bad/missing graphics, usually alpha-related"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51477">bug 51477</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=51477#c28">comment #28</a>)
<span class="quote">> The title of the bug includes NV10 and NV20. I am just a regular user (not a
> developer) but the fix below appears to only reference NV10. I have an
> Nvidia GeForece 3 Ti200 graphics card which is considered NV20. Does the fix
> also correct the issue for NV20 graphics cards?</span >
NV20 uses the same accel logic as NV10 for exa. Reports are that it does indeed
fix the issue for NV20 iirc. xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.11 is now released and
should contain this fix.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>