<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - MacBook Pro 5,x unable to boot [NV96 + NVAC]" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27501#c37">Comment # 37</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - MacBook Pro 5,x unable to boot [NV96 + NVAC]" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27501">bug 27501</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:MacGyver031@web.de" title="Joanand <MacGyver031@web.de>"> Joanand</a> <pre>Hi Pierre, Both patches seems to work (tested 1x on 3.17.rc6). Xorg-x11 starts with fluxbox, messages show that 9600 is unacclerated and 9400 is acclerated. There is are two errors in your patch "option for disabling accleration for given chipset": * The entries DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER are not available on 3.17.rc6, but it works either way. * In the kernel < 3.17 it should be "if (nouveau_noaccel || !nouveau_fifo(device) /*XXX*/)" not only "if (nouveau_noaccel)" Terminating xorg-x11 crashed, probably because I switched off discrete graphichs adapter after starting xorg. Someone else should check. Further testing is in queue. The previous patch you have sent: It solved a problem I had in the past: System kernel panics if the lid is closed during startup! Thanks. Do you think that acceleration for 9600M will be possible sometime? BR. (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=27501#c36">comment #36</a>) > This is the minimalistic version of the previous patch.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>