<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - X crash with PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR. (Nouveau on Riva TNT)." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - X crash with PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR. (Nouveau on Riva TNT)." href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28095">bug 28095</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> Ilia Mirkin</a> <pre>(In reply to Brent from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=28095#c8">comment #8</a>) > Tried Puppy Linux 6 with Linux kernel version 3.17.7, and got the identical > errors as with 3.14.20. > > I can't say if the PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR is still present, because I can't get > past this error to run any XWindows apps. X is running, it has not crashed, > but the display is corrupted and unusable. Those protection errors are expected... there's some minor difference between NV04 and NV05, and so those happen.... iirc with the NOP handle or class or something. I looked into it at one point and decided I didn't care enough (see <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [NV04] PROTECTION_ERROR / PROTECTION_FAULT" href="show_bug.cgi?id=68854">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68854</a>). Does it cause any actual issues though?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>