<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [NV118] GM108 not supported by nouveau" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89558#c24">Comment # 24</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [NV118] GM108 not supported by nouveau" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89558">bug 89558</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:smf.linux@ntlworld.com" title="SMF <smf.linux@ntlworld.com>"> SMF</a> <pre>(In reply to SMF from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89558#c23">comment #23</a>) > (In reply to SMF from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=89558#c21">comment #21</a>) > > Using cpu-z on windows the graphics tab shows the Intel device as having 4GB > > and the Nvidia devices is reported as 1GB. > > The literature that came with the laptop suggests that the VRAM is 4 GB > (NVIDIA GT840M 4 GB) so I think the answer is YES. My orginal hesitation > stems from the fact that the intel drm is reporting 2GB: > > [ 0.669881] Linux agpgart interface v0.103 > [ 0.669993] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 > [ 0.670484] [drm] Memory usable by graphics device = 2048M > [ 0.670569] [drm] Replacing VGA console driver > [ 0.671121] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 > [ 0.689829] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 2 (21.10.2013). > > That may be a miscalculion/limitation for this system. Could this be a > consequence of this systems Intel/Nvidia hybrid setup? Does the fact that my kernel and os are built for 32bit pae limit the drm vram to less than that physically present i.e. limited to 2G in this case?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>