<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [NVA5] Corruption in Plasma 5 on resume after changing screen configuration"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92504#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [NVA5] Corruption in Plasma 5 on resume after changing screen configuration"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92504">bug 92504</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imirkin@alum.mit.edu" title="Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>"> <span class="fn">Ilia Mirkin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Alexander Schlarb from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=92504#c13">comment #13</a>)
<span class="quote">> I hope this is more useful :-)</span >
*MUCH* more useful.
[ 91.919550] bo valid domains: 2
[ 91.919557] valid domains: 4
[ 91.919559] read domains: 0
[ 91.919560] write domains: 4
[ 91.919565] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: plasmashell[2578]: fail set_domain
[ 91.919569] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: plasmashell[2578]: validating bo list
[ 91.919587] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: plasmashell[2578]: validate: -22
So bo->valid_domains == VRAM, but we're trying to write to it via GART. Hmmmm.
I'm going to try to come up with a patch that figures out the gpu va of the bo
in question... hopefully that will provide further hints in conjunction with
the pushbuf dump.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>