<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Distorted graphics (double cursor) with GeForce 4200Go (NV28M)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54700#c74">Comment # 74</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Distorted graphics (double cursor) with GeForce 4200Go (NV28M)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54700">bug 54700</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:kurn@sfu.ca" title="AndrewK <kurn@sfu.ca>"> <span class="fn">AndrewK</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Ilia Mirkin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=54700#c64">comment #64</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=54700#c63">comment #63</a>)</span >
<span class="quote">> >
> > Option 3 could definately tell if it's only used for a particular memory
> > configuration of this chip, or it's more general (e.g. first 2 options).
>
> I've fired off a question to NVIDIA, hopefully they'll respond. Sometimes
> they respond ~immediately, other times it takes two months, but so far they
> haven't dropped anything on the floor.</span >
Well, now that it's more than a year, I think the floor can be considered the
likely destination. It would be nice to have an answer, but it's no longer
likely.
I think a fall-back to #2 (set the bit for N28 chips) is the most reasonable.
If all the other chips needed it, we'd have seen a flood of bug reports by now.
It's not as if this bug isn't obvious. X is unusable until it's fixed.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>