[ohm] OHM vs. PPM
hughsient at gmail.com
Thu May 1 13:20:53 PDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 20:01 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> This might sound strange, using an architecture created for embedded
> devices, for servers. But those two systems have more in common than
> one might think of. For embedded, at least AFAIK, you can consider the
> one session you have as system session. There's nothing like a decent
> desktop session. For server systems without a desktop, you also have
> only this one system level.
Sure. OHM was designed super small, quick, and per-system for a reason -
I'm against the change making it per-session. OLPC needs a per-system
solution, and won't be doing this in the session at all.
More information about the Ohm-devel