<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - No signal to monitor with X and openchrome using VX855 chipset graphics"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91966#c29">Comment # 29</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - No signal to monitor with X and openchrome using VX855 chipset graphics"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91966">bug 91966</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:bensberg@justemail.net" title="Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>"> <span class="fn">Benno Schulenberg</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Christopher from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91966#c28">comment #28</a>)
<span class="quote">> That would be, er, TahrPup 6.0.2... the one mentioned in the first post in
> this bugthread.</span >
So... Puppy 5.7.1 uses X.Org X Server 1.11.3, Release Date 2011-12-16, and
Puppy 6.0.2 uses X.Org X Server 1.15.1, Release Date 2014-04-13? And there is
no other version in between? The first uses openchrome 0.2.904, and the latter
openchrome 0.3.3? Right?
I had hoped you would have a non-working Puppy version that uses openchrome
0.2.905 or 0.2.906 -- then the things to look at would be much, much less.
BTW, could you stick to the matter at hand and leave out all descriptions of
cute little puppies? :) We're trying to find the root of a problem here, not
to write history. :)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>