[Openchrome-users] Modular branch

[Thomas Hellström]

Benno Schulenberg wrote:

>Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
>  
>
>>Info from the logs says you had set a virtual size of 1600x1200,
>>    
>>
>
>Hmm, but where does it do that?  
>
Not sure since I haven't seen your original Xorg.conf. Perhaps it chose 
the highest res the horizontal freq and dotclock did allow.

>In xorg.conf there is no setting 
>of DPI, and in the attached Xorg.0.log of a succeeding run it now 
>reports a DPI of 81,81 instead of 126,126.  Where does it get those 
>numbers from?
>  
>
The monitor reports its screen dimension in your log. There's about 25 
mm to an inch...

>  
>
>>The DDX driver is set up correctly, but I don't think you have a
>>mesa 6.4 3D driver installation?
>>    
>>
>
>No, I hadn't.  But with it, either HEAD or mesa_6_4_branch, it still 
>gives no direct rendering.  Although glxgears produces much better 
>FPS with these newer Mesas than with 6.2.1: around 500 fps instead 
>of around 120 fps.  But tuxracer and bzflag are unplayable with only 
>2 or 1 fps.  Output of glxinfo:
>
>name of display: :0.0
>display: :0  screen: 0
>direct rendering: No
>  
>
Mesa CVS is currently useless for Unichromes. What does glxinfo say when 
you enable libGL debugging output?

/Thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-users/attachments/20051206/45889a2e/attachment.html