rob at robmyers.org
Sat Jan 20 08:22:10 PST 2007
Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 19/01/07, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>> But NC-ND read stricly means you cannot actually use
>> them in any derivative works at all, for example in any typography. ;-)
> Its not CC ND-NC, and the license is pretty clear that its fine for
> use in commercial typographic design work.
D'oh you are right.
This was one of a number of fonts I looked at via Digg and I confused it
with another one. The bit about it being very cool still stands.
Sorry about that.
More information about the Openfontlibrary