[OpenFontLibrary] licence

[Dave Crossland]

2009/3/22 Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de>:
> Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>> 2009/3/22 Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de>:
>>
>>>
>>> I don't know if just removing "often" is enough. Then you say everything
>>> here is "free software". but there is also public domain stuff,
>
> You are right.
> I was just refering to the use of "free software", as a trigger for
> association with GNU GPL Richard Stallman etc. I think "free software" is
> more a synonym for all those things, not so much for public domain,
> creativecommons, or other stuff...

Do you think "free culture" is better than "free software"?

I still haven't reached a conclusion on how to described free fonts
best. "free fonts" speaks to freeware fonts that are often
non-commercial, non-modifiable and even non-redistributable.