[OpenFontLibrary] [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper

[Vernon Adams]

Erm… 
I think it, because i see clear evidence of it :)

The RFN part was probably not conceived as a copyleft component of the OFL. My point though, is that it can (under certain circumstances) also be used to preserve certain freedoms, more than it may ever restrict freedoms.

Do you see that the RFN can restricts a font's freedom? I'm interested to hear thoughts on that, as i'm still grappling with all this.

-v


On 23 May 2013, at 07:40, Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org> wrote:

> Why do you think the font name is so important that to keep using it
> those evil corporations will go out of their ways and sign deals with
> you? (not to mention that it is the copyleft part of OFL that ensures
> preservation of font freedom, not the RFN part).