[OpenFontLibrary] [GFD] OFL-FAQ update draft and web fonts paper

[Dave Crossland]

On 23 May 2013 07:46, Denis Jacquerye <moyogo at gmail.com> wrote:
> With some free software you have the freedom to sell it, to

Generally FOSS means freedom to sell it for any purpose. That the OFL
restricts selling and that the FSF and OSI have approved it as a free
software/open source license is surprising, and leads to a
pre-magna-carta logic; since those 2 groups define what FOSS is, and
they say OFL is FOSS, then OFL is FOSS.