So do we have consensus on these icons with the full acronym as text next to it? Only query I have remaining is if we keep all 3 as black or have different colors? <blockquote>On 31 Jul 2009, 10:26 AM, "Nicolas Spalinger" <<a href="mailto:nicolas_spalinger@sil.org">nicolas_spalinger@sil.org</a>> wrote: Dave Crossland wrote: > Full acronyms as text next to the icon is good, but again, I think > you're ...I see your point and you can probably understand where I'm coming from on this but licensing clarity is really a major feature of the whole library. This might be a small illustration, and we already have full reports on the page of the font itself but seeing as clearly as possible what rights are granted or reserved right there in the list of fonts is also needed. We care about good licensing and about not hiding it to users/contributors of the site, it's part of what makes this service stand out compared to existing font portals. Especially as the webfonts debate matures and recognizes the value of showing the right metadata to users... There are at least 4 well-known and widely used licenses starting with G... -- Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary <a href="http://planet.open-fonts.org" target="_blank">http://planet.open-fonts.org</a> </blockquote>