<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18904"></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=role_body
bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=7 rightMargin=7 topMargin=7><FONT id=role_document
color=#000000 size=2 face=Arial>
<DIV>>I'm confused.<BR>>You're pretty clear about what you think of Dave
(though I have no idea <BR>>why you come to that conclusion) - but you're not
that clear about the <BR>>domain:<BR>><BR>><BR>> It is currently
forwarding to openfontlibrary.org, but that may change.<BR>> Also. Someone
please fire Dave.<BR>> FontFreedom<BR>><BR>>Is there a planned change
from the frame linking to proper forwarding?<BR>><BR>>I see no way how
having active .org AND .com domains can be beneficial <BR>>to the
project.<BR>><BR>>Cheers,<BR>>Robert<BR>><BR>>Mr. Martinez:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The reason for openfontlibrary.com being what it (was) is to encourage
font developers to stop using the SIL Open Font License for their fonts. Certain
people (such as Dave Crossland) believe strongly in the SIL Open Font
License.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Whatever changes are made to the domain pointing / hosting / etc... They
will have to be determined through discourse.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mr. Eric Way<BR>FontBasis<BR>1 Market Plaza<BR>Spear Tower<BR>Suite
3500<BR>San Francisco, CA 94105</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>