<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Mar 14, 2014, at 5:31 AM, Reuben Thomas <<a href="mailto:rrt@sc3d.org">rrt@sc3d.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important;">"Free fonts will never match the quality of the fonts offered by top type design foundries."<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div></blockquote></div><br><div>If he means “free fonts” as a whole, compared to “the fonts offered by top type design foundries” as a whole, then maybe i can see that. But if he is talking about individual fonts, that just seems like a dumb statement, because there are plenty of examples of free fonts that offer better ‘quality’ than some non-free fonts from the ’top design foundries’. </div><div><br></div><div>-v</div></body></html>