<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Chris Murphy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@colorremedies.com">lists@colorremedies.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br></div><div class="im">
><br>
> If this is the way Apple sees it, no wonder there are a lot<br>
> of angry Color professionals out there. I certainly wouldn't<br>
> want to see any of the Linux systems to go down this route.<br>
<br>
</div>Again, I don't think we need to worry about this on Linux. It requires a massive distortion of reality and denial to come up with something this overly complicated that has consistently not worked for every single party involved: Apple, Adobe, HP, Epson, Canon, and all of their users have had nothing but problems with this scheme since it hatched, and was predicted it would be a huge problem, in advance, by 1/2 dozen people when the egg was laid, including yours truly</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>At least Apple has had color management for a loooong time. It's interesting to note that we are critiquing Apple in a thread that started with Linux, and it looks like it will take 5 years to attain the same level of maturity on Linux.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Edmund</div></div>