Robert, <div><br></div><div> Maybe I've used too harsh language here - it's not that we don't expose the options, it is that some off them should IMHO be placed in a "touch only if you really know what you are doing group", so that a user does not inadvertently get a bucket of ink running down the front of his large-format printer. </div> <div><br></div><div>Edmund<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:19 PM, edmund ronald <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:edmundronald@gmail.com" target="_blank">edmundronald@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Robert, <div><br></div><div> That is true, but it does apply ink limitation, I think, and ink-limitation is something which domain experts like Jan-Peter Homan will want to retouch for some media. </div> <div><br></div><div> I don't think we should tell people what options they are going to use in the "new"XML-driven Gutenprint, before we have the options we want to expose fully nailed down. And before we are fully willing to migrate those options forward.</div> <span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"> <div><br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Edmund</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div>