[packagekit] Signed packages again again
hughsient at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 14:19:24 PST 2007
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 17:09 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> it occurred to me that you may want to make some of the PolicyKit
> actions for PackageKit more fine grained. Basically, I think we want to
> support the use case mentioned in that comment; e.g. it should be
> possible to grant the user 'bob' the authorization to install signed
> packages but at the same time ensure he's not authorized to install
> unsigned packages. That's very useful in both enterprise and home user
Yes, this is sane.
> Looking at the current actions
It looks like you are not using git from the developer repo. update is
now update-package and update-system.
> I'm not sure where that is codified. Maybe introduce new actions
Define signed. Signed by who?
More information about the PackageKit