[packagekit] PackageKit soon to include the QPackageKit library, need advice

Adrien BUSTANY madcat at mymadcat.com
Sat Oct 18 14:53:32 PDT 2008


Rex Dieter a écrit :
> Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>   
>> Upstream the PackageKit-Qt library binding has been merged into the
>> PackageKit scm and will be in the next release tarball. This allows us
>> to keep the libraries in sync and also means QPackageKit gets a lot of
>> the love that PackageKit gets.
>>     
>
> Excellent news!
>
>   
>> Now we have two libraries (soon to be three), I'm intending to rename:
>> PackageKit-libs  -> PackageKit-libs-glib
>> PackageKit-devel -> PackageKit-glib-devel
>> This allows us to create PackageKit-libs-qt and PackageKit-qt-devel and
>> then provide this for other QT and KDE applications to trivially build
>> against.
>>     
>
> I concur with drago01, and would personally opt for names of the form PackageKit-glib(-devel) and PackageKit-qt(-devel), but whatever floats your boat.
>   
I agree with Rex, is that a problem with Fedora' packaging conventions ?
> -- Rex
>
> _______________________________________________
> PackageKit mailing list
> PackageKit at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/packagekit/attachments/20081018/5e002225/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the PackageKit mailing list