[packagekit] KPackageKit 0.1 and QPackageKit2 released
hughsient at gmail.com
Mon Sep 29 07:19:34 PDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 15:54 +0200, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
> Well there's already an old version in rawhide, I don't know who's in
> charge of the package... I'd like to package the lib and the ui
> separatly, as a change in the lib doesn't always imply a change in the
Sensible, this is what they've done in fedora.
> (and I payed great attention to binary compatibility concerns in the
Cough. I wish I was as good at API and ABI stability.
> BTW, I think I'll drop the 2.0 in order to follow PK's versions (it's
> easier to understand that QPackageKit 0.3.x drives PackageKit 0.3.x).
> What do you suggest ?
Yes, you should have 0.3.x else people will get confused. Also you
should probably host the tarballs somewhere more permanent. You can use
http://www.packagekit.org/releases/ if you want. Yell if you need a
> Should I contact the package maintainer ?
I've cc'd him on this email. Steven, can I update the versions of
packagekit-qt and kpackagekit, or do you want to do it?
More information about the PackageKit