[packagekit] search terms should be "one word" ?
mounir.lamouri at gmail.com
Sat Jun 27 06:32:40 PDT 2009
Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Mounir
> Lamouri<mounir.lamouri at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here, the search terms will hit License and Description but that's not
>> the same section. I think it could be great to have a more powerful
>> tool to let people searching for various things with some flexibility.
>> And "have to be found in same section" will not be easy to understand
>> for users.
> Yes, a valid point. Maybe any section matches is the best plan.
I've attached the patch i've written to make Search* clearer.
I'm waiting for your answer to push it.
>> And when I was updating specifications (will be pushed as soon as I
>> have an answer about this last question), I've seen SearchName should
>> not be sensitive to "-" and "_". You mean "-" equals "_" ?
> To be honest, I'm not sure.
Maybe we should remove this from the specification if no one is using it ?
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the PackageKit