<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Richard Hughes wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:15e53e180709101438v757322emacd8bf613973f7cb@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On 10/09/2007, Justin Haygood <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jhaygood@reaktix.com"><jhaygood@reaktix.com></a> wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">They can, considering they are standard RPMs, but it's a whole legal grey area.. they didn't agree to any EULA, and the packages (third party non open-source binaries) can't easily be changed to prompt the user to agree to them at runtime. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Being blunt, sorry, but I don't think broken proprietary software should cause the API design to be completely reworked. Packages _have_ to be installed silently by the daemon. Richard. _______________________________________________ PackageKit mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org">PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a> </pre> </blockquote> +100<br> <br> Tim<br> </body> </html>