<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Matej Cepl wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:slrnfj4983.4fr.mcepl@hubmaier.ceplovi.cz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 2007-11-07, 13:58 GMT, Ken VanDine wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I disagree about pkcon being just for testing... PackageKit
represents a common UI for multiple packaging systems. I think
sharing a common UI, both GUI and CLI is valuable. We should
definately treat pkcon as a first class citizen.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
+1
moreover, blaming pkcon is just a merciful lie, because
pk-application cannot do the same either. So, Tim, what is meant
to be used for real when it is neither pkcon nor pk-application?
Matěj
</pre>
</blockquote>
What is was trying to say, was that removing with deps was not
implemented in pkcon, because there need to be some confirmation to
what is removed.<br>
I was not my intent make pkcon a second class citizen. :)<br>
<br>
Tim<br>
</body>
</html>