<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Richard Hughes a écrit : <blockquote cite="mid:1222677184.3385.6.camel@hughsie-laptop" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 18:59 +0200, Adrien BUSTANY wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I'm using the dummy backend for my unit tests, and backend_get_details sends back GPL2 as a license, whereas pk-enum.c waits for GPLv2... </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> The licence property is not an enumerated type. The licence type can be a composite type such as: Python and LGPLv2+ and BSD and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+) The best site I've found on this is the Fedora wiki, <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines</a> I've added a note in the source. </pre> </blockquote> I see... I saw an enum in pk-enum, so I did one in QPackageKit too. My point was that backends should either stick to GPL2 or GPLv2, even if it's not an enumerated type...<br> <blockquote cite="mid:1222677184.3385.6.camel@hughsie-laptop" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Btw, that dummy backend doesn't work at all, I can't manage to install packages with it ;) </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Why? What happens? I use it every day for testing. </pre> </blockquote> nevermind, that was a stupid joke :)<br> <blockquote cite="mid:1222677184.3385.6.camel@hughsie-laptop" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Richard. _______________________________________________ PackageKit mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org">PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html>