<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Rex Dieter a écrit : <blockquote cite="mid:gddjdq$96a$1@ger.gmane.org" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Richard Hughes wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Upstream the PackageKit-Qt library binding has been merged into the PackageKit scm and will be in the next release tarball. This allows us to keep the libraries in sync and also means QPackageKit gets a lot of the love that PackageKit gets. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> Excellent news! </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Now we have two libraries (soon to be three), I'm intending to rename: PackageKit-libs -> PackageKit-libs-glib PackageKit-devel -> PackageKit-glib-devel This allows us to create PackageKit-libs-qt and PackageKit-qt-devel and then provide this for other QT and KDE applications to trivially build against. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> I concur with drago01, and would personally opt for names of the form PackageKit-glib(-devel) and PackageKit-qt(-devel), but whatever floats your boat. </pre> </blockquote> I agree with Rex, is that a problem with Fedora' packaging conventions ?<br> <blockquote cite="mid:gddjdq$96a$1@ger.gmane.org" type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> -- Rex _______________________________________________ PackageKit mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org">PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a> </pre> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html>