<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:49F01872.1050902@fedoraproject.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 04/23/2009 08:07 AM, Viper550 wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">We cannot use Smart. We internally decided long ago that major system
components may not depend on interpreters. Unfortunately, we cannot
allow this because it is partially python based. Although Smart can run
on our distro (heck, installed it myself earlier, runs better than
APT-RPM for sure), we can't make it the default.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Off-topic but what's wrong with interpretors? Panu from Red Hat is the
upstream maintainer of APT-RPM and even Red Hat doesn't use it by
default (though it is available in the repo as a alternative along with
Smart). It seems strange for a desktop distribution to have a bias
against a language based on whether the current implementation is
interpreted or compiled. Many "system" components like bind have parts
written in Perl as well. If upstream decides to rewrite more of the key
system components in Python, Perl or something else, there isn't much a
distribution can do.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
PackageKit mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org">PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
I don't know why either. But anyway, we also can't use Zypp since it
has a dependency on hal (which he has also refused to include), and yum
also uses python (but I also thought yum was slow last time I used it
on a distro so there, and I don't even think it supports RPM 5).
Anyway, we also already got patches for APT-RPM to support RPM 5, and
as I said before, there is another major distribution that uses apt-rpm
(PCLinuxOS).<br>
<br>
Can somebody steu up to the plate and assist us?<br>
<br>
Viper550<br>
</body>
</html>