In my opinion, switch to <a href="http://transifex.net">transifex.net</a> might be more convenient for transaltors.<div><br></div><div>After registering on fedora account system, I still have no writing permission to fedora-transifex now. :s</div> <div>I have sent a mail to <a href="mailto:trans-zh_tw@lists.fedoraproject.org">trans-zh_tw@lists.fedoraproject.org</a> and try to figure it out.</div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Richard Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com" target="_blank">hughsient@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 24 February 2010 11:39, Tseng, Cheng-Chia <<a href="mailto:pswo10680@gmail.com" target="_blank">pswo10680@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > I knew that PackagKit is fermented in Fedora project, but why don't it use<br> > <a href="http://transifex.net" target="_blank">transifex.net</a> service to provide<br> > all the translators to do the job instead of registering a Fedora user first<br> > then translating on fedora-transifex?<br> <br> </div>When we started, <a href="http://transifex.net" target="_blank">transifex.net</a> was just an idea. If there's a<br> compelling reason, we can switch. I'm not tied to the Fedora project<br> transifex instance, it just supplied the infrastructure when I needed<br> it.<br> <div><div></div><div><br> Richard.<br> _______________________________________________<br> PackageKit mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank">PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sincerely, <br>by Cheng-Chia Tseng<br> </div>