<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>yep, also using aptcc backend (pulled as dependency over apt backend, which didn't happend on Lucid as i recall).<br><br>Best regards,<br><br>D.H. Bahr<br><br>----- Mensaje original -----<br>De: "Jean Hubbard" <jean_p57@hotmail.com><br>Para: packagekit@lists.freedesktop.org<br>Enviados: Viernes, 15 de Octubre 2010 10:31:17 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected<br>Asunto: Re: [packagekit] PackageKit-Gnome issues in Ubuntu Maverick<br><br>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
Using the aptcc(default) backend.<br><br>Regards <br>Jean <br><br><br><br>> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:54:39 -0700<br>> From: dantti85-pk@yahoo.com.br<br>> To: packagekit@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> Subject: Re: [packagekit] PackageKit-Gnome issues in Ubuntu Maverick<br>> <br>> BTW aptcc and python apt backends both have the PATH set. What backend are you <br>> using?<br>> Using KPackageKit works?<br>> <br>> Best.<br>> ________________________________<br>> Daniel Nicoletti - KDE Developer<br>> http://dantti.wordpress.com<br>> When a wicked man dies, his hope perishes;<br>> all he expected from his power comes to nothing. Prov. 11:7<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> ----- Mensagem original ----<br>> > De: Anders F Björklund <afb@algonet.se><br>> > Para: PackageKit users and developers list <packagekit@lists.freedesktop.org><br>> > Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 14 de Outubro de 2010 13:27:14<br>> > Assunto: Re: [packagekit] PackageKit-Gnome issues in Ubuntu Maverick<br>> > <br>> > Jean Hubbard wrote:<br>> > <br>> > > I have submitted a bug in regards to this. Bug #634053. This has been in <br>> >ongoing problem in Ubuntu. When it has showed the packages, they dont install. <br>> >I believe that was the case with Lucid. The smart backend seems to have similar <br>> >issues. Bug #598165. Hasnt worked at all since i been trying it in Karmic.<br>> > <br>> > I don't think the smart backend bugs were ever posted upstream ?<br>> > <br>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/598165<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > The problem is that PackageKit doesn't set PATH for the smart backend.<br>> > <br>> > commit e2e963fc22ddbd70575f5cbd42d074789396e4bf<br>> > <br>> > APT-DBUS: dpkg requires a PATH variable, so set it. Minior code clean <br>> >ups.<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Adding the same PATH workaround to the smartBackend too makes it work:<br>> > <br>> > +# Required for daemon mode<br>> > +os.putenv("PATH", <br>> >"/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin")<br>> > +<br>> > if __name__ == "__main__":<br>> > main()<br>> > <br>> > --anders<br>> > <br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > PackageKit mailing list<br>> > PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit<br>> > <br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> PackageKit mailing list<br>> PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org<br>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit<br>                                            <br>_______________________________________________
PackageKit mailing list
PackageKit@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/packagekit
</div></body></html>