[Piglit] [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Add a simple testcase to test that GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER is per vao
brianp at vmware.com
Wed Nov 23 11:24:37 PST 2011
On 11/23/2011 12:12 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:34:30 +0800, Yuanhan Liu<yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From 9a1da8748f0faa23f34398213ff7ee45fda6bf36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Yuanhan Liu<yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:37:33 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add a simple testcase to test that GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER
>> is per vao
>> According opengl spec 4.2.pdf table 6.12 (Vertex Array Object State) at
>> page 515: the element buffer object is listed in vertex array object.
>> Add a testcase to test that.
>> v2: fix n careless 'always-return-PIGLIT_PASS' fault.
>> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu<yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
>> diff --git a/tests/general/vao-element-array-buffer.c b/tests/general/vao-element-array-buffer.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..8803bff
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/general/vao-element-array-buffer.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Intel Corporation
>> + *
>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
>> + * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
>> + * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
>> + * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
>> + * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
>> + * Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
>> + *
>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
>> + * paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
>> + * Software.
>> + *
>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
>> + * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS
>> + * IN THE SOFTWARE.
>> + *
>> + * Authors:
>> + * Yuanhan Liu<yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
>> + */
> Generally, the style I advocate is to not include the Authors line in
> copyright messages. git records who the author was already, and will
> provide a more accurate view of who wrote the current code if someone
> wants to know some time down the line. I don't know how many times, 5
> years later, I've had emails from someone asking about some code I'd
> "written" that just had my name in the header and nothing else really of
> mine, from back when we were including Authors lines in the CVS days.
>> + glutSwapBuffers();
> If you switched this to piglit_present_results, this test could be an
> add_concurrent_test() instead.
Under what circumstances can't glutSwapBuffers() be replaced by
I'm guessing many/most of the tests that use the former could be
changed to use the later. That might be a good project for someone
who wants to contribute.
More information about the Piglit