[Piglit] [PATCH 11/11] max-texture-size: Cut SubImage data allocation by 1/4.

[Kenneth Graunke]

I honestly have no idea why, but the original test calls TexSubImage
with a width and height of *half* the texture size.  Yet it allocates
enough temporary pixel data for a full texture.  This makes no sense,
and clearly one or the other should change.

Without understanding why the existing test does what it does, I chose
to not change it and simply cut the memory allocation.  Cutting memory
usage also may reduce the likelihood of GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY errors.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
---
 tests/texturing/max-texture-size.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/texturing/max-texture-size.c b/tests/texturing/max-texture-size.c
index e0e1684..60ebc15 100644
--- a/tests/texturing/max-texture-size.c
+++ b/tests/texturing/max-texture-size.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ test_non_proxy_texture_size(GLenum target, GLenum internalformat)
 	       piglit_get_gl_enum_name(internalformat),
 	       maxSide);
 	/* Allocate and initialize texture data array */
-	pixels = initTexData(target, maxSide);
+	pixels = initTexData(target, maxSide/2);
 
 	if (pixels == NULL) {
 		printf("Error allocating texture data array for target %s, size %d\n",
-- 
1.8.5.2