I think it would not hurt to move these two tests into the serialized category and see if this helps. If that does not work adding a note about older systems ( and the use of the gbm backend ) is probably a good idea. <div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 18, 2014 12:39 PM, "Mark Janes" <<a href="mailto:mark.a.janes@intel.com">mark.a.janes@intel.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">EXT_timer_query and ARB_timer_query tests fail intermittently, causing confusion for developers running quick.py to find regressions. These tests have always been intermittent, and people generally know to ignore them when they fail. However, if everyone ignores a test, there is no point in running it all the time. --- tests/quick.py | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/quick.py b/tests/quick.py index 8762d7d..0856f75 100644 --- a/tests/quick.py +++ b/tests/quick.py @@ -12,3 +12,5 @@ del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-fs-inline-explosion'] del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-fs-unroll-explosion'] del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-vs-inline-explosion'] del profile.tests['shaders']['glsl-vs-unroll-explosion'] +del profile.tests['spec']['EXT_timer_query'] +del profile.tests['spec']['ARB_timer_query'] -- 2.1.3 _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list <a href="mailto:Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org">Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit</a> </blockquote></div>