[Pm-utils] Set performance governor instead of userspace
pjones at redhat.com
Tue Oct 10 17:04:59 PDT 2006
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 18:09 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> I'm just looking over the 94cpufreq hook which sets the userspace governor
> immediately before suspend. I think this was needed because of dead locks
> of the ondemand governor in the past, right?
Yes -- in fact, I don't think it's a problem any more, so we can
probably just remove it soon, or just disable it in distro's packaging,
but leave it in CVS. Maybe we should add some auto* stuff to disable
individual scripts' installation by default.
> Wouldn't it be better to set the performance governor then? Because if
> frequency is low and you set the userspace governor, frequency will keep
> to be low if you have no userspace daemon caring about.
> Anyway, setting the performance governor would be a good idea in any case
> because of compression and stuff we will have in the near future.
Doesn't matter -- the machine isn't going to be _running_. And when it
is running again, we're going to go back to the same governor that we
had before. So basically, we're talking about ~2 seconds of runtime
that this will effect.
Since that's the case, I'd rather just leave it as "userspace", if only
for the reason that it doesn't _do_ anything. Less stuff being done
means less chances of having to hack on this again when a bug is
More information about the Pm-utils