[Pm-utils] Userspace suspend support for pm-utils
hughsient at gmail.com
Sat Jun 23 12:57:58 PDT 2007
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:54 +0200, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:51:52 +0200
> Tim Dijkstra <newsuser at famdijkstra.org> wrote:
> > OK, this will set --quirk-none to the exported quirks in case of a
> > machine confirmed to be working without quirks. Please apply.
> OK, now we have this. We have to think how we want to use it. s2ram
> always refused to suspend if a machine wasn't in the white list. Now we
> have --quirks-none we can do the same in pm-utils.
Well, I think refusing to suspend is a bit harsh, but I understand why.
> We can maybe teach hal to notice this and tell g-p-m that suspending
> didn't succeed. g-p-m could then tell the user to go and find out what
> quirks are needed.
In RHEL 5 g-pm we query HAL for the suspend failure, maybe we can review
this again for upstream?
More information about the Pm-utils