[Pm-utils] [PATCH 1/8] pm-utils 1.2.3 proposed patches
victor.lowther at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 07:34:13 PST 2008
On Dec 1, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Stefan Seyfried <seife at suse.de> wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 01:57:01PM -0600, Victor Lowther wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 16:53 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>>> The acpi_sleep parameter is a documented kernel interface and many
>>>> people currently rely upon it. It's not reasonable to override it.
>>> How many rely on it vs. rely on HAL to do The Right Thing?
>> I have no idea. It's existed longer than pm-utils has.
> People who want to use acpi_sleep= kernel parameter can still do
> that - but
> not in combination with pm-utils (or s2ram for the matter, since it
> clears the flag since quite some time).
> Which is a good idea IMVHO, the bug reports I have got have shown
> this to be a
> quite sensible approach.
And with autoquirk support, it is dead simple for users who rely on
the acpi sleep stuff to generate a .fdi file for their hardware.
> And yes, hopefully this will all be soon over when the kernel does
> all the
> video resume (and then we can push the bugs to the kernel
> developers ;)
> Stefan Seyfried
> R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?"
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."
> This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers:
> SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
> Pm-utils mailing list
> Pm-utils at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the Pm-utils