I imagine that libproxy could be ported to Duktape similarly to what I did in my branch. <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, 11:08 AM Shawn Walker-Salas <<a href="mailto:shawn.walker@oracle.com">shawn.walker@oracle.com</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 09/08/2015 10:37 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: ... > I personally don't have a strong objection to JS as an embeddable > configuration language: general purpose systems often need it anyway, if > only for proxy autoconfiguration support (I'm not a fan of proxy > servers, particularly non-transparent ones, but large corporations seem > to be inexplicably keen on them). However, I'm not a maintainer of > polkit in Debian (the maintainers are Michael Biebl and Martin Pitt) so > my opinion counts rather less than theirs. One of the distributions I help maintain was debating whether to simply disable proxy configuration file support entirely or work on modularising if further as various administrators have complained about the fact that installing libproxy dragged in a pile of desktop dependencies (because we were linking to the libmozjs in the Firefox package rather than using the standalone libmozjs due to concerns others mentioned about stability, security, etc.). I wonder if the subset of javascript support that's really generally needed for proxy autoconfiguration is small enough that it could be transpiled and handled by a much smaller, safer interpreter such as lua, etc. I suspect the answer is "in most cases, but not all, so it would break things" :-( -- -Shawn _______________________________________________ polkit-devel mailing list <a href="mailto:polkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" target="_blank">polkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/polkit-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/polkit-devel</a> </blockquote></div>