No, but an upstream like myself would have to rewrite their rules. If an upstream is unaware, it could be a shock. <div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 8, 2015, 11:01 AM Matthew Miller <<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org" target="_blank">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>> wrote: </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:29:14AM -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > ( I do wonder how Debian runs gnome-initial-setup then -- > <a href="https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-initial-setup/tree/data/20-gnome-initial-setup.rules" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-initial-setup/tree/data/20-gnome-initial-setup.rules</a> > -- there's one upstream that uses that ability ) At quick glance, there's nothing there that the old syntax couldn't cover, is there? > Miloslav, do you want to consider reverting JS rules files then, if > Debian is never going to switch to them? For what it's worth, I'm very much in favor. -- Matthew Miller <a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org" target="_blank">mattdm@mattdm.org</a> <<a href="http://mattdm.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mattdm.org/</a>> Fedora Project Leader <a href="mailto:mattdm@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">mattdm@fedoraproject.org</a> <<a href="http://fedoraproject.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/</a>> </blockquote></div>