<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - handling of rtl text inversion is too naive"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55977#c21">Comment # 21</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - handling of rtl text inversion is too naive"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55977">bug 55977</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alexbodn.groups@gmail.com" title="alex <alexbodn.groups@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">alex</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55977#c20">comment #20</a>)
<span class="quote">> Do we really need to support both icu and freebidi? Looks like a maintaince
> nightmare.
>
> What's the license of FindFriBiDi.cmake? Can you clear it up from wesnoth
> stuff?
>
> Did you write FindICU.cmake yourself?</span >
i have to apologize here. i have no idea of cmake stuff.
just searched the net to provide the files, but don't know how to use them.
here is the license for wesnoth(GPL):
<a href="http://wiki.wesnoth.org/Wesnoth:Copyrights">http://wiki.wesnoth.org/Wesnoth:Copyrights</a>
for visual to logical approximation, icu is far more suitable than fribidi, but
fribidi is smaller and did good work the far i could test.
however, fribidi is meant for logical to visual reordering, while we mainly
need the opposite here.
if icu would lack on some build system, i'd definitely settle for fribidi, even
for visual to logical approximation.
alex</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>