<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - handling of rtl text inversion is too naive" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55977#c26">Comment # 26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - handling of rtl text inversion is too naive" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55977">bug 55977</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:alexbodn.groups@gmail.com" title="alex <alexbodn.groups@gmail.com>"> alex</a> <pre> hey albert, sorry to have been pushy. it just turned out to be harder to lobby my patches than to even make them. but i promise to be more patient :). (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=55977#c25">comment #25</a>) > Ok, let's go back here. I think we (that is you) should decide if ICU or > Fribidi. There is no need to support two libraries that do the same, just > decide on "the best" and let's go from there. > > What do you think is the best of those two? categorically, icu does provide the needed functionality. fribidi is just smaller, but not really meant for visual to logical text reordering. so should i remove the fribidi part of my patches?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>