<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [TAGGEDPDF] Parse the Tagged-PDF document structure tree when present"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64815#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [TAGGEDPDF] Parse the Tagged-PDF document structure tree when present"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64815">bug 64815</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aperez@igalia.com" title="Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Adrian Perez de Castro</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> Maybe you can split the patch in those 3 things? to make it a bit easier to
> review?</span >
Ouch, the commit message does not really describe well the patch after
the rebasing/squashing done prior to uploading. But I can split it up
in three logical parts:
- Defining the StructElement class and parsing of the corresponding
objects from the PDF.
- Defining the Attribute class and parsing the corresponding objects
from the PDF.
- Text content extraction, a.k.a. the machinery needed for
StructElement::getText() and StructElement::getMCOps()
If there's no objections, I would upload an updated version with the
patch split in three mentioned above soon.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>