<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - Cairo backend for Qt4 wrapper" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25240#c35">Comment # 35</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED INVALID - Cairo backend for Qt4 wrapper" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25240">bug 25240</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:pdgiddie+freedesktop@gmail.com" title="Paul Gideon Dann <pdgiddie+freedesktop@gmail.com>"> Paul Gideon Dann</a> <pre>Just wanting to check I understand your reasoning correctly: you don't want to merge this because you think people will dislike the idea of linking Qt with Cairo (a GObject-based library), because the two camps are traditionally politically opposed (Qt vs GTK). Is that right? If so, can you explain how that point of view is compatible with Canonical's integration of Qt in Ubuntu Edge, which I assume (at least with your Canonical hat on) you're at peace with? (Not intended aggressively; I genuinely don't understand.)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>