<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - 100% CPU usage" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66928#c22">Comment # 22</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - 100% CPU usage" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66928">bug 66928</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=66928#c21">comment #21</a>) > If (yet to be seen) using getRGBLine fixes the problem, i just think we > should kill getRGB since it's probably never really needed, but let's see if > getRGBLine fixes the issue or not and then discuss how to proceed. Are You sure Albert? We can call getRGBLine in case of images, but nowhere else! I.e. every shading, but I think also a lot of other calls, can call getRGBline with only one value, and in this case, I will not expect any performance increasements. So You can wait until I try to increase speed with the usage of getRGBLine(), but You never van kill getRGB() at all!</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>