<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - pdfseparate - error checking for destFileName precludes use of valuable sprintf options" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50914#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - pdfseparate - error checking for destFileName precludes use of valuable sprintf options" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50914">bug 50914</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dkg@fifthhorseman.net" title="Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>"> Daniel Kahn Gillmor</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=85930" name="attach_85930" title="allow zero-padded pagespecs">attachment 85930</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=85930&action=edit" title="allow zero-padded pagespecs">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=50914&attachment=85930'>[review]</a> allow zero-padded pagespecs This is a pretty dumb patch that enables the use of %01d, %02d, ... up to %09d. If you have a billion-page PDF it won't let you zero-pad it properly :P It doesn't change the current default non-zero-padded behavior of %d (i don't know if anyone is relying on that) and it doesn't auto-detect what the size of the zero-padding should be. The patch was written to apply to 0.22-5, i think.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>