<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [TAGGEDPDF] Parse the Tagged-PDF document structure tree when present"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64815#c52">Comment # 52</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - [TAGGEDPDF] Parse the Tagged-PDF document structure tree when present"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64815">bug 64815</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aperez@igalia.com" title="Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Adrian Perez de Castro</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64815#c51">comment #51</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=64815#c49">comment #49</a>)
> >
> > The Attribute class implementation is huge, you might consider moving it to
> > its own file
>
> Sure thing.</span >
...with the problem that it is not that easy. The “typeMap” table and the
private static functions at StructElement.cc that use the TypeMapEntry use
AttributeMapEntry. So the tables would still need to be in StructElement.cc.
Also, some Attribute methods use the static helper functions, and I would
rather have the Attribute class in StructElement.cc than duplicating code
for those.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>