<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906#c39">Comment # 39</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW --- - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906">bug 58906</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> Thomas Freitag</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=58906#c38">comment #38</a>) > Asked if those patches are going to make it to a release, at this point, > does it make sense to pick openjpeg2 over openjpeg1 when we know it gives us > less quality? 1. According the comments on the openjpeg bug the jp2 image included the PDF You attached is invalid, s. <a href="https://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=254#c11">https://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=254#c11</a> 2. If we wait until all "bugs" are solved we can wait at the Greeks calends :-) , and probably support of openjpeg 1 will be suspended earlier. 3. Some other bugs /features are solved i.e. in openjpeg 2.1 which will no more be fixed in openjpeg 1, see i.e. eci altona testsuite v2. 4. But I think we can discuss about what openjpeg version should be used by default if both are installed</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>