<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906#c41">Comment # 41</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906">bug 58906</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:aacid@kde.org" title="Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org>"> <span class="fn">Albert Astals Cid</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>There seems to be some movement at
<a href="https://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=254">https://code.google.com/p/openjpeg/issues/detail?id=254</a> that's good
I know openjpeg2 can have some fixes/features versus 1, but sincerely i'd
prefer we at least don't regress and prefer 1 over 2 (for the moment) so people
stay at least as they are in the pdfs they had.
what everyone else thinks?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>