<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - evince can not find ü in attached PDF"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87215#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - evince can not find ü in attached PDF"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87215">bug 87215</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jason@aquaticape.us" title="Jason Crain <jason@aquaticape.us>"> <span class="fn">Jason Crain</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>If you look at the copy and paste from adobe reader and chrome, the word 'Über'
is not actually in that document. The diaresis is separate from the 'U'. We
could make search looser by stripping out combining characters. Looks like
that's what adobe reader and chrome do. Is that the kind of thing that people
would want? Being able to find 'uber' by searching for 'über' or 'ubér' or
'ũb̏ȇ̱r̽'?
That might make some people upset. We already have <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Not able to find (only) ordinals (ª,º,...)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=85702">bug # 85702</a> requesting to
make search stricter. Though personally I think a looser search makes sense.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>