<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906#c49">Comment # 49</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - 0.22.0 does not find openjpeg-2.0.0"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58906">bug 58906</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de" title="Thomas Freitag <Thomas.Freitag@alfa.de>"> <span class="fn">Thomas Freitag</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=58906#c48">comment #48</a>)
<span class="quote">> Ok, so i've run the reg test with openjpeg1 and all is fine, openjpeg2 code
> asserts in lots of places.
>
> I guess is how we want to proceed. I'd suggest:
> * Get the cmake code done
> * Commit
> * Create a master "openjpeg2 regresses" bug in our bugzilla
> * Create a child bug for every file that i have that regresses
> * Try to get the openjpeg2 devels to fix openjpeg.
>
> Comments?</span >
That's ok for me. Just one question: which openjpeg2 code do You use? As far as
I remember when I used the subversion checkout there are not so many asserts in
my regression test.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>